Infantile colic.

Infant colic is characterized by excessive and often inconsolable crying in an otherwise healthy and well-fed infant. Infant crying follows a developmental pattern, starting to increase around 2 weeks of age (corrected for gestational age at birth), peaking at 5 to 6 weeks, and trailing down by about 12 weeks. There is also a circadian component in that infants cry more in the evening than at other times. Infant colic can be thought of as an amplified version of the maturational, circadian-influenced behavior of infant crying. There is substantial evidence for an association between infant colic and migraine. Children with migraine are more likely to have been colicky as infants, and in a prospective, population-based study, young adults with migraine without aura were more than twice as likely to have been colicky as infants. Mothers with migraine are more likely to have infants with colic, particularly those mothers with higher headache frequency. Clinicians should be aware of these associations in order to be able to counsel appropriately pregnant women with migraine about the possibility of having an infant with colic (and its time-limited nature), and to help make an accurate diagnosis of migraine in children and adolescents presenting with recurrent headaches.

More Than a Headache: Lived Experience of Migraine in Youth.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is the leading cause of disability among adolescents and young adults. We aimed to characterize the impact of migraine on the experience of children, adolescents, and caregivers. METHODS: This descriptive qualitative study recruited youth aged four to 18 years with migraine and their caregivers from the multicenter, prospective Pediatric Migraine Registry between 2020 and 2021. Participants completed semistructured interviews targeting the lived experience of migraine. A conventional content analysis approach was used to analyze data. RESULTS: Thirty enrolled dyads (n = 30 children and adolescents, n = 29 caregivers) completed 59 interviews (n = 29 child and adolescent interviews, n = 30 caregiver interviews). Children and adolescents had a median age of 15 years and experienced a median of 13.5 headache days per month. Caregivers had a median age of 44 years and predominantly identified as mothers (n = 28). We identified three themes: (1) Impact on emotional well-being: participants described how their migraine experience included feelings of isolation, depression, and irritability alongside the need for social support; (2) Impact on daily life: participants described how symptoms and unpredictability impacted their ability to perform activities of daily living; and (3) Impact on school: participants described how migraine impacted their school experience, including threatened attendance and worsened performance. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of youth and their caregivers, we identified salient themes to characterize the experience of migraine. Our findings underscore the urgent need for effective migraine treatments and interventions targeting co-occurring mental health conditions, peer relationships, and school support.

Melatonin for migraine prevention in children and adolescents: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial after single-blind placebo lead-in.

BACKGROUND: Melatonin is effective for migraine prevention in adults. We hypothesized that melatonin would also be effective for migraine prevention in children and adolescents. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind trial of melatonin (3 mg or 6 mg) versus placebo for migraine prevention in 10-17 year-olds with 4-28/28 headache days at baseline. Participants were recruited from the UCSF Child & Adolescent Headache Program, UCSF child neurology clinic, and social media advertisements. Migraine diagnosis was confirmed by a headache specialist. Participants completed an 8-week single-blind placebo run-in. Those meeting randomization criteria (≥4 headache days and ≥23/28 electronic diary entries during weeks 5-8) were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo:melatonin 3 mg:melatonin 6 mg nightly for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was migraine days in weeks 5-8 of randomized treatment between melatonin (combined 6 mg + 3 mg) versus placebo. We aimed to enroll n = 210. RESULTS: The study closed early due to slow enrollment (n = 72). Two participants were in the single-blind phase when the study closed, therefore the meaningful n = 70. Sixteen percent (11/70) were lost to follow-up during the single-blind phase. An additional 21% (15/70) did not meet randomization criteria (<4 headache days: n = 5, <23/28 diary days: n = 7, both: n = 3). Sixty-three percent (44/70) were eligible to randomize, of whom 42 randomized (n = 14 per arm). Taking another preventive at enrollment (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.01 to 68.9) was the only variable associated with meeting randomization criteria. Of those randomized, 91% (38/42) provided diary data in the final 4-weeks. However, given the amount of missing data, only those with ≥21/28 diary days were analyzed-7/14 (50%) in the placebo group, and 20/28 (71%) in the melatonin groups combined. Median (IQR) migraine/migrainous days in weeks 5-8 of double-blind treatment was 2 (1-7) in the placebo group versus 2 (1-12) in the melatonin groups combined; the difference in medians (95% CI for the difference) was 0 days (-9 to 3). There were no differences in adverse events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to recall at enrollment, headache days decreased across the single-blind placebo phase and the double-blind phase. There was no suggestion of superiority of melatonin; however, given the substantial portion of missing data, numerically higher in the placebo arm, and underpowering, this should not be interpreted as proof of inefficacy. Melatonin was generally well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Future migraine preventive trials in this age group may find this trial helpful for anticipating enrollment needs if using a single-blind placebo run-in. Enriching for those already on a migraine preventive may improve randomization rates in future trials, though would change the generalizability of results.

Bridging the gap between preclinical scientists, clinical researchers, and clinicians: From animal research to clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Collaborations amongst researchers and clinicians with complementary areas of expertise enhance knowledge for everyone and can lead to new discoveries. To facilitate these interactions, shared language and a general understanding of how colleagues in different subfields of headache and headache research approach their work are needed. METHODS: This narrative review focuses on research methods applied in animal studies, human studies including clinical trials, and provides an overview of clinical practice. RESULTS: For animal studies, we describe concepts needed to evaluate the quality and relevance of preclinical studies. For human research, fundamental concepts of neuroimaging, quantitative sensory testing, genetic and epidemiological research methods, and clinical research methodology that are commonly used in headache research are summarized. In addition, we provide an understanding of what guides headache clinicians, and summarize the practical approach to migraine management in adults and children. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that this review facilitates further dialogue between clinicians and researchers that will help guide future research efforts and implementation of research findings into clinical practice.

Eptinezumab for adolescents with chronic refractory headache: A retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for the treatment of chronic refractory headache in adolescents. BACKGROUND: Chronic refractory headache can lead to school absences and impaired quality of life in adolescents, and currently there are no pharmacologic treatments with level A evidence for headache prevention for this population. While observational data suggest that monoclonal antibodies to calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor may be helpful for adolescents who have refractory primary headache disorders, evidence is lacking for the use of eptinezumab. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review. Demographic and headache phenotypic data were collected. Outcome measures included headache intensity and frequency pre- and post-infusion(s), and improvement in function or in associated symptoms. Adverse events were also collected. RESULTS: Nine patients with chronic migraine and two with new daily persistent headache received a first dose of 100 mg of eptinezumab. All of them had daily headache and nine had continuous headache at baseline. After the first infusion of 100 mg, two patients were no longer having daily headache, one patient stopped having continuous headache, and four patients noted headache intensity reduction. Additionally, one patient described a reduction in nausea and vomiting, and another patient noted improvement in function. Six patients received a second eptinezumab infusion of 100 mg, three had a third one, and one patient had four infusions of 100 mg. After the second infusion, one patient noted reduction in headache frequency, one experienced lower headache intensity, and two described pain "improving." With the third and fourth infusions, patients continued to report improvement in headache intensity. Subsequent infusions of 300 mg resulted in further reductions in headache frequency and intensity for some patients. Eptinezumab was overall well tolerated. CONCLUSION: While this was a small sample, findings suggest that eptinezumab may be a safe and effective treatment for chronic, refractory headache in adolescents.

Outpatient Approach to Resistant and Refractory Migraine in Children and Adolescents: a Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Migraine is one of the top reasons for consulting a pediatric neurologist. Although the majority of children and adolescents who receive evidence-based first-line interventions for migraine will improve substantially, a subset of patients develop resistant or refractory migraine. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we summarize the level of evidence for a variety of acute and preventive treatment options to consider in children and adolescents with resistant or refractory migraine. We describe the level of evidence for interventional procedures (onabotulinumtoxinA injections, greater occipital and other nerve blocks), neuromodulation (single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, external trigeminal nerve stimulation, remote electrical neuromodulation, and non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway antagonists (anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants), psychological therapies, and manual therapies (acupuncture, craniosacral therapy, massage and physical therapy, and spinal manipulation).

Beyond pain control: Outcome and treatment preferences in pediatric migraine.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe treatment preferences and perceived quality of existing outcome measures among children and adolescents with migraine and their caregivers. BACKGROUND: Across disciplines, there is increasing recognition of the value of direct input from stakeholders. Little empirical work has been done to determine what outcomes matter most to pediatric patients with migraine and their caregivers. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we recruited participants from the multicenter, prospective Pediatric Migraine Registry. We used stratified purposive sampling to recruit children and adolescents of varied ages and headache frequency. Patients with migraine and their caregivers completed semistructured interviews targeting treatment preferences and perceived quality of existing outcome measures. Emergent themes and subthemes were identified using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Thirty dyads of children/adolescents and their caregivers were enrolled and completed 59 interviews (n = 29 children/adolescent interviews and n = 30 caregiver interviews). Three themes emerged. (1) Symptom relief: Looking beyond headache resolution: Participants described the value of outcomes in addition to pain relief, including a reduction in migraine intensity and improvement in non-pain symptoms. (2) Trade-offs between side effects and relief: Participants described cost-benefit analyses that can occur with headache treatment and acknowledged the impact of drug side effects on daily life and medication adherence. (3) Child-centered treatment: Participants described medication attributes salient to the pediatric context, including age-appropriate routes of administration and adequate safety data. CONCLUSIONS: Children, adolescents, and caregivers impacted by migraine value outcomes in addition to traditionally studied migraine endpoints. Participants valued decreased pain severity, even in the absence of pain resolution. Participants also prioritized the absence of side effects and key medication attributes, including fast onset and age-appropriate routes of administration. These results highlight an opportunity to design patient-centered clinical trials, develop drugs, and support product labeling that align with the outcomes valued most by children and adolescents with migraine and their caregivers.

The spectrum of indomethacin-responsive headaches in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Headaches with marked, specific response to indomethacin occur in children, but the phenotypic spectrum of this phenomenon has not been well-studied. METHODS: We reviewed pediatric patients with headache showing ≥80% improvement with indomethacin, from seven academic medical centers. RESULTS: We included 32 pediatric patients (16 females). Mean headache onset age was 10.9 y (range 2-16 y). Headache syndromes included hemicrania continua (n = 13), paroxysmal hemicrania (n = 10), primary stabbing headache (n = 2), short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (n = 1), primary exercise headache (n = 1) and primary cough headache (n = 1). Adverse events were reported in 13, most commonly gastrointestinal symptoms, which often improved with co-administration of gastro-protective agents. CONCLUSION: Indomethacin-responsive headaches occur in children and adolescents, and include headache syndromes, such as primary cough headache, previously thought to present only in adulthood. The incidence of adverse events is high, and patients must be co-treated with a gastroprotective agent.

Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Intravenous Sodium Valproate in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Chronic Headache Disorders: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic headache disorders can cause substantial disability and be treatment refractory. Often, these patients are excluded from clinical trials with leaving little evidence to guide treatment. In adults, divalproex sodium is an effective preventive migraine treatment. METHODS: All pediatric patients admitted for first-time sodium valproate infusions to treat refractory, chronic migraine (CM), new daily persistent headache, or persistent headache attributed to head trauma from January 2017 to October 2020 were identified for review. Each patient underwent a standardized, 4-day protocol. A new preventive was started one week after discharge. Data on headache frequency, severity, and acute medication use were collected through preadmission and postadmission clinic notes. Safety and tolerability were evaluated. Results were evaluated using descriptive statistics and compared with paired t-tests. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were identified for review. Patients with CM had a median of 7 previous preventive trials, and 85% had previously received alternative intravenous treatment for headache. Baseline headache pain significant decreased from 6.9/10 to 5.4/10 by 7-week postadmission follow up, (95% confidence interval = -0.7 to -2.4), P < 0.001. Use of medications for acute headache treatment decreased significantly from 2.1 days/week to 1.5 days/week, (95% confidence interval = -0.3 to -1), P < 0.001. Baseline headache frequency did not significantly change. At postadmission follow-up, 26 of 39 (67%) patients saw improvements in headache frequency, headache intensity, and/or acute pain medication usage. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive sodium valproate infusions were well tolerated and significantly reduced baseline headache intensity and acute medication usage in pediatric patients with refractory, chronic headache disorders.

Effects of melatonin on sleep disturbances in multiple sclerosis: A randomized, controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are commonly reported by people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, optimal management of sleep disturbances is uncertain, and objective studies of sleep quality in PwMS are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of exogenous melatonin on sleep quality and sleep disturbances in PwMS. METHODS: Thirty adult PwMS reporting sleep difficulties were recruited in a randomized, controlled, double-blind cross-over study. They took either melatonin or placebo for 2 weeks, and the opposite for the following 2 weeks. During weeks 2 and 4, an actigraph was used to capture mean total sleep time and sleep efficiency. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at weeks 0, 2 and 4. RESULTS: Melatonin use significantly improved mean total sleep time (p = 0.03), with a trend towards higher sleep efficiency (p = 0.06). No PROs were significantly different; there was a trend for melatonin use to decrease mean Insomnia Severity Index score (p = 0.07), improve Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index sleep quality component (p = 0.07), and improve NeuroQoL-Fatigue (p = 0.06). No other PROs showed differences between melatonin and placebo; nor did step count measured by actigraphy (all p > 0.45). CONCLUSION: These results provide preliminary evidence that melatonin, a low-cost, over-the-counter supplement, could improve objective measures of sleep quality in PwMS.